Seven Years

Seven years
I've spent trying to dodge the lies
living life from joy
to meaningless joy
filling the void with shameful highs
and pretending it's the dream I kept inside

I've given into temptation
until there's nothing left to surrender
and now I only see tearful nights awaiting me
as I stare into my future's horizon

Because it's just another need to me
like the food I eat
it's hunger cured with shame
and a pain that stains my pillow
when I try to rest on those empty nights
wasted where I don't belong
getting things I'll never need

I never beat my demons
just changed them ones with smiling faces
while carrying promises never meant to be held
I pretended everything was fine
when I was more broken than ever
just a shell of who I could have been
and a shadow of what I was before

I want to turn and face the truth
but how can I fight who I am
How can I conquer what I need
when I feel it beating within my veins

So as I lay here
temporarily pacified
with tears of shame streaked across my face
and broken promises ringing in my head
I cower in the dark again
too weak to stand up to myself
powerless to challenge who I am
even as the world plays my weaknesses
like a bow on a violin
I know the struggle will never end
only abated by momentary joys

Even when gazing into the eyes of love
I'm just a pathetic soul
born again just to be sacrificed
like so many times before
in these seven years
I've lived through the blur of addict's eyes
where highs are lows
and everything in between is a bed of lies
and though I see the truth now
and gaze upon my sins with open mind
the world remains unchanged

For it's seven years until tomorrow
tomorrow when I'll be broken again
just another empty day
spent bowing before my vices
while trying to call it life
between dodging the lies
and living the meaningless joys
I've come to know so well

Twelve Steps to Democracy

There seems to be a quiet understanding in American that our political system is broken. Less than half of the nation votes, many offices, especially on the local level, aren’t even contended and our rate of Senator re-election is higher than it ever was in Communist Russia.

The bitter truth is that the American political system is broken and, even as we go overseas and try to spread democracy to other lands (often by force), our own democracy is hopelessly tarnished and flawed.

We have to do better and that means taking some drastic steps. Even though said steps here might not completely fix the system, they would much better and bring it more in line with the idealistic vision we all hold of it.

So, without any further ado, here’s the twelve-step program to kick America’s habit of ineffective democracy and get it on the path to a government both the people and the world can be proud of.

Step 1: Admit that there is a problem

First off, we have to admit that there is a problem with our current government. This means both citizens and leaders need to wake up that our political system is flawed and needs to be repaired. What worked a hundred years ago falters now and we need to update both our government and our mentality. Otherwise, things are only going to get worse.

Step 2: Eliminate the Electoral College

As I’ve said in previous essays, the Electoral College is an archaic system designed to take direct election of the President out of the hands of the people. It causes votes in rural states to be worth more than ones in heavily-populated ones and creates situations, like in 2000, where a candidate can win the majority vote but lose the election. It’s time for an easier direct-elect system to be implemented not only to restore the population’s faith in the system, but to make it a real democracy.

Step 3: Force states to allow voter registration for third parties

Currently, in all but 21 states, you can’t register as a member of a third party. Thus, if you aren’t a Democrat or a Republican, you have to register as an independent, if at all. No country, especially one of 290 million people, can have the entire spectrum of opinions represented by just two parties and one of the biggest hurdles to a significant third party is the inability for voters to register and be recognized a member of one.

All political parties, large and small, should be eligible to register voters. Reasonable requirements should be made so that not just anyone can create a party, but the doors need to be opened to an already thriving independent political scene so they can compete on a level playing field.

Step 4: Ballot access to all parties

Currently, getting a slot on all fifty state ballots is so difficult that only Democrats, Republicans and Libertarians are even attempting it in the 2004 election. With all states allowing third-party registrations, it would be a simple matter to allow the top 7 parties a slot on every Presidential, Senate and House ballot across the country.

Since write-in candidates are always at a severe disadvantage over those on the ballot, allowing all parties a place on the ballot goes to great lengths to level the playing field and represent more Americans in the elections.

Step 5: Equal access to funds for all parties

Currently, only parties that earn Electoral College votes are eligible for government funds. Thus, only the Republican and Democratic parties ever get government aid for their campaigns while the menagerie of third parties have to do without.

All parties, not just those that have the fortune of currently being in power, deserve same access to the funds. Either government matching funds should be stopped or access to them should be given to all parties. After all, political speech isn’t more valuable just because it comes from a major party; it’s an important right for all.

Step 6: Get serious about campaign finance reform

One of the biggest problems with the American democracy is the rampant corruption the current campaign finance system brings about. Politicians on both sides of the aisle take insane contributions from corporations and individuals alike and only a fool would believe that those contributions aren’t seen as an investment. The result is that politicians are often forced to forget their constituents and remember their contributors. This puts too much power into the hands of the wealthy and creates (at least the appearance of) a shadow government comprised of corporate greed.

Fixing loopholes in the current system is like trying to fill the gaps in sieve with pushpins. It just can’t be done. If we’re going to get serious about it, we need to start over, throw out all the rules and begin with a clean slate.

One suggestion I do have is limiting the contributions made to a campaign or party by a single entity. A person is an entity, a corporation is an entity and a non-profit is an entity, etc. Basically, anything with its own tax code counts as an entity.

If we set the limit low, at say 50 thousand dollars, no one individual or company can wield too much control. The most a wealthy CEO can donate is 100 thousand (50 for himself and 50 for his company) and anyone who wanted to circumvent the law, they’d have to engage in clearly unscrupulous activities (such as setting up false corporations) that would both be well-documented and highly illegal.

Then, we could begin to prosecute those who try to use money to subvert the government using money rather than rewarding them with perks and privileges.

Step 7: Make Election Day a holiday

It seems silly, but most people don’t get Election Day off and have to take off from work to do their duty. The state and federal employees get off most private companies don’t give their employees the day off. It’s one of the big obstacles that stops so many Americans from heading out to the polls and it’s something that must be dealt with, preferably by forcing employers to offer holiday pay to employees they make work on it.

Since Election Day happens only every other year, the damage to the economy would be minimal and it might give more Americans, especially poor Americans who can’t afford to miss work, the chance to vote.

Step 8: Overhaul the election process

The election process itself is in need of a major overhaul. In the age of computers and cell phones, the fact we’re putting up with butterfly ballots and late poll openings is outright embarrassing.

We need to standardize the election process nationwide, making equipment and procedures standard coast to coast. We also need to make sure that everyone lives and works near a polling place and that they can go to the one of their choice, not just to the one closest to where they live. Going back to number seven, many are taking off work to go vote and many work far away from their homes and, thus, their polling place.

Step 9: Embrace electronic voting

Electronic voting promises to make the tallying of results easy and painless. It has the potential to eliminate debates about who won or lost and make handling large elections, like the presidential one, many times easier for both voters and counters.

The catch is that any electronic voting machine should produce a physical voting record that is stored much like regular ballots are now. These ballots should be tallied after the election is decided to ensure that there was no tampering with the system and that the electronic results are authentic.

This system maintains accountability while embracing the benefits of electronic voting. Something that nearly every polling location in the country has failed to do.

Step 10: Change media coverage

Though media coverage of political events is extremely important, media coverage of election-night events can greatly sour the political process.

As it is right now, the media frenzy starts well before the polls have closed, states are predicted to be won or lost well before polls in western states have closed. This can discourage people in later time zones from voting at all or cause them to change their vote at the last minute.

Simply put, election results should not be released to the media until after the polls have closed everywhere (yes, even Hawaii) and, if all of the above steps have been implemented, it should be an easy matter of reporting who won and how much they won by. With electronic voting and direct election, there will be no more Florida-style debacle where a state is promised to candidate X before the time has really come to call it.

For those who say that this would abridge free speech, we have to remember that one of the key functions of our freedom of speech is the protection of the political process and a delay in announcing results (rather than announcing them along and along like is done now) would go to great lengths to protect the process and would only hinder the drama of election night, not the actual news coverage.

Step 11: Put an end to attack ads

Right now, non-profit groups not affiliated with a campaign (and thus not bound by campaign finance reform) are not allowed to endorse a candidate with paid TV time. However, they are free to attack the guy they don’t like and blast him right off the air.

Attack ads do little hinder anyone but they go to great lengths to sicken voters and turn them away from the polls. The idea behind 527s and other non-profit political organizations was to allow for people to use the airwaves to discuss political issues while not endorsing a candidate, not to allow them to libel their guy’s opponent.

Endorsing a candidate and attacking another both serve the same function politically and both should be bound under the same finance laws. Speaking out on an issue is one thing, but endorsing a candidate, even by attacking his opponent, is another.

We should all be free to express our opinions, but the current setup allows for candidates to have “attack dogs” not bound by campaign finance laws. This opens the door up for more corruption and more voter disgust. It’s a loophole that needs to be plugged immediately.

Step 12: Learn from other nations

Steps one through eleven don’t have all of the answers to our problems, but then again, neither will any twelve-step program. That’s why we need to make a point to look to other countries and see how they’ve overcome the challenges inherent with democracy.

What can Canada, Germany, Britain, France and even Russia teach us about our government? They all have different democracies, new and old, that are handled in different ways. Even though we became the first modern nation to apply this form of government, we have much we can learn from those who followed in our footsteps.

After all, what we laid down was a beautiful, if imperfect, government that was a model for others. We owe it to ourselves to see how others have improved and modified our model and how we, in turn, can improve on theirs.

Because government, like everything else, is a learning process and we can’t learn if we don’t open up our eyes and our minds.

Ixnay the Judges

I’m not a sports fan. I feel I should make the clear up front. I’m not the type to obsess over what season it is or isn’t, I don’t play fantasy sports and I don’t follow any teams, college or pro, with any zeal.

In fact, I can’t say that I took any real interest in the Olympics. I checked the medal counter from time to time, I watched the headlines as they’ve come up and caught, at most an hour or two of coverage. It, like most other sports, held little draw to me and don’t seem to fulfill my personal life in any way.

However, I do recognize that sports, due to their significance to others, has a tremendous impact on the world around us and play a surprisingly large role in international politics and the global community. As anyone who read about the recent Japan/China soccer match knows, sports can raise tensions between nations, symbolize a budding friendship between countries or serve as an olive branch between feuding lands.

On that note, the Olympics are supposed to be the ultimate olive branch. It’s a place where all of the nations of the world can meet on the field of athletic competition and interact not as enemies, allies, superpowers or conquered lands, but as individuals and athletes.

So grand is this notion that, during the ancient Olympic games in Greece, any wars that were ongoing were stopped for the Olympics and athletes were given safe passage to the games.

Though no one expects quite that level of chivalry in these modern times, it would be nice if the games still hearkened back to the idea that they are the athletic olive branch and that they have a role in creating global harmony.

But to do that, they must first take a radical step, eliminate all events that are decided entirely or largely by judges. Period. If a competition can’t be one by being faster, stronger, scoring more points or some other tangible, measurable attribute, it needs to be tossed.

Simply put, by allowing events that are decided by judges, the Olympics are leaving competitions open not only to controversy, but to personal preference, bias, whims, political dispositions and a million other factors that have nothing to do with athletics at all.

Think about it, even if we ignore the recent spate of judging errors and other controversies, judging an event, especially something like gymnastics or diving, is a purely subjective thing. How can we expect, in events where the margin of victory is 1/100 or even 1/1000 of a point, that a judge’s personal bias, political or personal, doesn’t make the difference between silver and gold.

As long as judges are humans making subjective calls, they’re going to make them for odd reasons, especially in “toss up” situations. It doesn’t matter if the judge likes or dislikes the athlete’s country, political ideology or their outfit. These are all elements that should never have a bearing on their score but very likely will.

What’s the result of all of this subjectivity? First off, voting blocs are formed. As the recent ice skating scandal proved, Olympic judges are not above working with other judges to give their country an edge. Given human nature and patriotism, we should have expected this behavior and I’m sure the 2002 games wasn’t the first time it happened, just the first time it was exposed.

Second, it opens the door for controversy. Is Hamm really the Olympic gold medallist? Should a second medal be awarded to the Koreans? What about the Americans who had their routine reduced to 9.9 starting value afterward? And what about the Russian gymnast who got his score changed after the crowd expressed extreme disapproval? Judges make it so that we have champions no one is really sure are champions and losers that, on another day with the exact same routines, could have won just as easily.

Finally, and worst of all, it creates disharmony between nations. Since there is no “Switzerland” of international competition, judges to come from competing nations and, as such, it’s inevitable that, at some point, a judge will vote high on his own country or low on an opposing one and cause an international incident.

Because even though sports, in the big picture of politics and global relations, are minor and insignificant, emotions do run high around them for both athletes and spectators. Like it or not, feuds and even wars have started over sport and the Olympics opening the door to such high controversy in such a tense, global, environment is not just dangerous, it’s borderline irresponsible.

After all, we don’t want the olive branch of sports to become a flashpoint for world tension. There’s enough hazard in that without adding the element of human judges to the mix. We need to minimize the role of third party participants as much as possible and make the playing field as fair and unbiased as we can.

It’s not only in the best interest of the Olympics and the notion of fair play, but in the best interest of world harmony.

Atrocity

When we look at the evil deeds of other men, we work hard to distance ourselves from them. The most vile and evil individuals in our history lose their humanity, at least in our eyes, and become monsters, demons or worse.

It’s very convenient that, the minute someone commits a heinous crime or an unspeakable act, that we cast them aside as a monster, forever tossing their humanity to the wind. It makes it easy for us as insecure souls to write them off and distance ourselves from them without giving our own demons a second look.

But truth is never written in black and white and it is seldom convenient. Though we call people monsters or push them aside as animals, the truth is that they are human, the same as you and I are and, as difficult as it is to face, we are all capable of the same unspeakable deeds.

Yes, the lack of humanity some of mankind’s worst has displayed is frightening and even terrifying. We all shudder to imagine what it would be like to be at the mercy of a remorseless killer or under the thumb of a ruthless dictator, but have we ever stopped to wonder that, in a different world, we could actually be that person.

We’re a society of people perpetually on edge, never more than a few steps away from madness and not as far removed from our animal roots as we’d like to think. Our instincts and desires lay there, repressed, waiting to creep up, often in perverted and twisted forms.

That’s why, as much as we love to cast aside societies villains, all it does is toss more sand on our inner demons and shorten the fuse just a hair. The longer we turn a blind eye to what we’re capable of, the easier it becomes for our own sinister side to creep to the surface and make monsters out of ourselves.

The only way we, as a species, can hope to control our demons is by first facing them and understanding them. That, of course, means accepting them as part of our nature and that’s something that, as we’ve gotten more and more “civilized”, has grown harder and harder to do.

And that’s why, even as we’ve prided ourselves on being more peaceful and more humane, hideous “monsters” have continued to rise up among our ranks. Naive thinking such as “Learning humanizes character and does not permit it to be cruel” has made us all blind to the nature humans and the evil that often lurks right underneath our nose.

We can no longer afford to fool ourselves. We cannot let our civility blind us to what lurks within all of us. The world is too dangerous for naivete to be our policy. We must see evil where it lies, not just in the deeds of other men and women, but within our own hearts.

Where it has laid this entire time.




Order The Book


Raven's Rants Book Cover

Raven's Rants:
The First Five Years


More Information

Plagiate this site are automatically captured and verfolgt.Layered Tech